menu_long

Poultry
Maximizing Shell Quality
By Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc.

With the incidence of undergrades due to deteriorating shell quality ranging from 2 to 10% as the bird ages, managing for optimum shell quality should be a major part of a pullet and layer farm management program.

Shell quality is impacted by numerous factors, including, genetics, nutrition, feeder management, body weight and age at light stimulation, heat stress, egg gathering, egg belts, de-escalators, processing equipment, disease, and gut health. The following article is a discussion of some of these factors.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 18.2.

Impact of Amino Acid Complexed Zinc and Manganese on Egg Shell Quality
By Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc.

With the incidence of undergrades due to deteriorating shell quality ranging from 2 to 10% as the bird ages, feeding and managing for optimum shell quality is a major part of a layer feeding and management program.

The relatively high calcium and phosphorus levels in layer feeding programs designed to improve shell quality in breeds with lower shell quality characteristics may adversely impact the utilization of inorganic mineral sources such as manganese and zinc, both of which are very important in bone and eggshell metabolism. Deficiencies of both manganese and zinc will decrease shell quality. Anecdotal testimony and two research studies presented at the 2002 International Scientific Forum in Atlanta indicated that 40 parts per million (PPM) supplemental zinc and manganese in the form of amino acid complexes was effective in maintaining good egg production levels and shell quality in ISA White layers and an unspecified brown egg layer breed.

Given the financial importance of shell quality and skeletal integrity, we conducted two studies at the Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc. research farms to see if we could replicate the results reported at the 2002 International Scientific Forum. In the first study, we evaluated the impact of amino acid complexed zinc and a combination of amino acid complexed zinc and manganese on the performance and shell quality of Hy-Line W-98 layers from 88 to 101 weeks of age

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 17.2.

Controlling Mature Feed Intake: How much is excess feed intake hurting your bottom line?
By Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc.

When we discuss feed intake control in egg laying birds, it is typically in the context of controlling egg weight. However, we often forget that, in addition to contributing to excess egg weight, excess feed intake will increase the cost of production.

When growing pullets, our goal is to get the birds into production and attain the optimum egg weight target as soon as possible. Because many performance problems can be traced to poor feed consumption at the onset of production, we use moderate energy pullet diets that allow for a smooth energy transition from the grower to peak diet and high fiber levels that enable the pullet to develop the gut capacity to consume adequate feed at the onset of production. In addition to using dietary manipulations and feeder management to encourage good feed consumption at the onset of lay, we also work with low house temperatures and wide diurnal (day to night temperature difference) that work to increase early feed intake. Unfortunately, all of the management and nutrition techniques used to encourage good early production and egg weight can, if managed poorly, lead to excess body weight, excess egg weight, and excess feed intake. The end result will be poor shell quality, poor feed efficiency, and increased feed cost.

In this article, I'll examine nine things you can do to control mature feed intake.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 16.4.

Feeding Layers in Cold Weather
Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc.

The winter months have traditionally provided the egg industry with its most favorable seasonal market. However, the benefits of an improved market can be quickly negated by excessive feed costs resulting from elevated feed intake. Controlling feed costs can maximize winter flock profitability. This can be accomplished by: 1. Controlling house temperatures; 2. Maintaining good feather cover; 3. Increasing dietary energy levels and feeding balanced diets; and, 4. Reducing feeding frequency and intermittent lighting.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 15.6.

Heat Stress and Shell Quality
by Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc.

As we were all reminded during the summer of 1999, heat stress (>87°F) is a severe physiological stress and is a major factor in the failure of many pullet and layer flocks to achieve breeder standards for growth, maturity, and performance. Now that we are approaching the time of the year when pullet and layer performance can be adversely impacted by heat stress, I would like to briefly discuss the physiology of heat stress and basic management techniques to minimize its impact on performance.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 14.1.

Maximizing Shell Quality
by Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

With the incidence of undergrades due to deteriorating shell quality ranging from 2 to 10% as the bird ages, managing for optimum shell quality should be a major part of a pullet and layer farm management program.

Shell quality is impacted by numerous factors: genetics, nutrition, feeder management, body weight and age at light stimulation, heat stress, egg gathering, egg belts, de-escalators, processing equipment, disease, and gut health. The following article is a discussion of some of these factors.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 17.2.

Impact of Feed Enzymes on Layer Performance
By Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services

The use of feed enzymes is a common practice in wheat and barley-based poultry diets worldwide; however, enzyme producers have found it quite difficult to develop efficacious cost effective products for corn-soybean meal and sorghum-soybean meal based diets.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 15.4.

Feathering in Commercial Pullets and Layers
By Dr. Michael Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

INTRODUCTION
With approximately 65% of the cost of producing eggs being feed cost, maintaining good feather cover is of considerable economic importance to the pullet and layer industry. Poorly feathered layers will have increased body heat loss and elevated feed intake with poor feed efficiency. Factors influencing feather cover include housing density, group size, mechanical wear (rubbing against cage mates or cage sides), feather pecking, beak trimming, molds and mycotoxins, and nutrition.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 17.4.

No Fast Molting
By Dr. Michael Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

INTRODUCTION
Molting is a natural process in which the bird takes a break from egg production, renews its feathers, rebuilds its calcium stores, and regresses and rebuilds its reproductive tract. Because a molt can be induced by a number of influences, one can always find some birds within an egg laying flock that are going through a molt. Induced molting is the process in which the egg producer uses management and nutrition tools to coordinate all of the birds within a flock to molt at the same time. Many researchers have investigateed alternative molting techniques, including numerous marginal dietary treatments such as low sodium, low energy, corn alone, high fiber, high aluminum, high copper, and low protein.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 14.3.

Hot Weather Management
By Dr. Michael Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

INTRODUCTION
High environmental temperature (>87F) is a severe physiological stress and is a major factor in the failure of many pullet and layer flocks to achieve breeder standards. Now that we are approaching that time of the year when pullet and layer performance can be adversely impacted by heat stress, I would like to briefly discuss heat stress and basic management techniques to minimize its imipact on performance.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 16.2.

Probiotics and Prebiotics in Poultry Feeding Programs
By Dr. Michael Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

INTRODUCTION
Vaccines and antibiotics were very important pieces of the puzzle that enabled the poultry industry to move from a backyard flock-based industry to the large scale production facilities of today. It is estimated that 17% of the antibiotics used in animal production are used at sub-therapeutic (growth promoting) levels. Public health professionals have suggested that the use of sub-therapeutic antibiotics in animal agriculture may be partially responsible for the development of antibiotic resistant bacterial populations. This has led to the increased regulation, and in some cases, the banning of the use of growth promoting antibiotics in animal agriculture.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 16.6.



Swine
The Importance of Lactation Feed Intake to Maximum Sow Herd Production
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

Lactation feed intake provides both nutrients for milk production and piglet growth as well as for the maintenance of body condition. Genetic selection trends towards younger, larger, more productive sows with less body fat stores have put additional pressures and demands on maximum nutrient intake during the lactation period. In addition, larger litter sizes also dictate the need for superior nutrient intake. Gilts are especially vulnerable because of their inherent low feed intake and can lose as much as 15% of their body protein mass during a lactation period. If body protein and fat stores are not maintained properly, lifetime performance will certainly suffer. Sub-standard feed intake during the course of lactation can result in longer wean to estrus intervals, decreased farrowing rates, reduced litter sizes, an increased culling and replacement rate, increased pre-weaning mortality, and poor post-wean pig performance. Therefore, lactation feed intake patterns can serve as the barometer for either long-term success or continued failure in the sow production system.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 18.2.

The Immune System and Your Animals
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

The following article is the first section of a multi-part series on the immune system and its effects and influence on the health and growth performance of production animals. The first section will focus on the basics of the immune system and how it operates with following articles to focus on its interactions with other factors and the role of nutrition in its operation and maintenance.

Most producers accept the fact that disease and pathogens are a normal part of producing pigs. When morbidity and mortality occur, the usual course of action is to target the pathogen with the appropriate feed medications and possibly follow up with a vaccine program for long-term control, if available. Poor performance is then attributed to the particular disease, and we move on. But how much of this is due to the pathogen itself, and how much is the fault of the animals own physiology?

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 17.2 & 17.3.

Water Quality: Problems, Solutions, and Considerations
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

Water quality is an often overlooked, yet crucial, area of swine production that deserves more attention because of its wide-ranging effects on health and performance. Water is an essential nutrient that plays a crucial role in numerous physiological and metabolic functions including acid/base balance, body temperature regulation, metabolic by-product removal, nutrient translocation within the cells, and joint lubrication, and many other functions.

Generally speaking, pigs will consume between two and three gallons of water for every pound of feed consumed. Therefore, if water consumption is curbed due to any reason, including quality, temperature, odor, acidity, animal health status, nutritional plane, ambient temperature, relative humidity, or drinker malfunction, feed intake and subsequent performance will be impaired. This holds especially true in the breeding herd since milk produced by the lactating sow is approximately 80% water. Therefore, a regularly scheduled water quality analysis should be performed to ascertain the status of the drinking water source for quality characteristics. The most routinely measured parameters for quality fall under either a microbiological, physical, or chemical classification and can include any number of tests and assessments.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 15.4.

The Antibiotic Resistance Debate: Where Did It Come From and Where Is It Going?
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

Today, one is just as likely to hear the term “antibiotic resistance” on the evening news as one is at a scientific meeting or an ecology seminar. We are continuously bombarded with the nuclear-winter type scenarios unfolding before us unless we heed the warnings and begin to limit the use of feed grade antibiotics for food production animals. What isn’t so clear is where and how this silent killer became such a problem and whether or not it is a real enough threat for us to be concerned with it in our daily lives. To understand the facts behind the media sensationalism we must first understand why and how antibiotics are used in the production of food animals.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on antibiotic resistance, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 15.6.

The Hidden Savings of Good Feeder Management Practices
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

The current long-term trent of below break-even prices has forced us to take a closer look at not only the cost of feed itself but also the costs of our feeding practices. Feed wastage can be the critical difference between a profitable swine operations and a pork enterprise that operates at a loss.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on antibiotic resistance, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 16.2.

Preventative Tips For Improving Growth and Productivity in Swine
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

With the sweltering summer heat and humidity of August in full swing, there is no better time than the present to address the effects of heat stress on your swine herd and to maximize their production potential under less than ideal conditions. Pigs, like people, have very specific needs when it comes to temperature and humidity preferences. However, pigs cannot release excess body heat by means of evaporation (sweating) like humans can. Therefore, the minimization of heat stress is an important management tool to optimize summer swine production. Thermal stress on a growing pig can result in decreased growth rates and feed consumption, poor health status as well as death loss during transport and holding. Thermal stress in breeding animals induces metabolic and physiological alterations resulting in decreased ovulation rate, fertilization rate, embryonic survival, and litter size as well as sperm quality and quantity issues in boars. Consequently, it should be the goal of every operation to minimize the detrimental effects of heat stress on their animals by environmental means as well as by non-thermal intervention strategies.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 16.4.

Feed Conversion: Improving Your Cost of Production
By Dr. Chris Parks, Swine Nutritionist, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

Profitability in the swine industry has always been a delicate balance between the cost of raising a hog to market weight and the value of that mature hot when it reaches the processor. The primary cost associated with producting a mature hog is feed--whether in the price of the feed itself or the usage of that feed by the pig. With feed ingredient prices on their way up and carcass prices hovering on the downside, now is the time to revisit issues that impact how well the pig converts feed into a sellable product. Numerous factors affect feed utilization including disease, nutrition, environment (primarily temperature), and stress. The following is a brief look into the mechanics of feed conversion and some suggestions by which to improve your bottom line when it comes time to take that animal to market.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative, technical services, or e-mail: webmaster@wengerfeeds.com.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter, 16.6.



Feed & Feed Ingredients
Why Plant Transgenic Corn & Soybeans?
Dr. Michael A. Elliot, Director of Technical Services, Wenger’s Feed Mill, Inc.

I recently had the opportunity to give a presentation at the Center For Rural Pennsylvania’s Rural Summit In The City Meeting in Harrisburg. I was asked to discuss Biotechnology in Agriculture from an agribusiness perspective. In preparing the presentation, I endeavored to put together a talk that discussed both the benefits to the farmer and the actual impact on herbicide and insecticide usage. Following is a brief summary of my presentation.

Since being introduced to the world market in 1996, the global area of transgenic crops has increased from 4.3 million acres in 1996 to 125 million acres in 2001 (Table 1). As shown in Table 2, adoption of this technology has been most rapid in the United Sates. The primary transgenic crops grown in the U.S.A. are herbicide tolerant soybeans, insect resistant corn, and insect resistant cotton. Table 3 shows the transgenic planting percentage for each of these three crops from 1998 to 2001. The drop in market share for transgenic corn in 2000 and 2001 is thought to be due to a reduced challenge from the corn borer and nervousness regarding the ability to export transgenic corn to Western Europe and Asia.

Because the vast majority of local corn and soybeans is used for animal feed and very little goes to the export market, the transgenic planting percentage for corn and soybeans is considerably higher in Southern Pennsylvania than the national average (Table 4).


There are a number of reasons that farmers have endorsed transgenic technology. These include increased crop yields, decreased pesticide usage and cost, decreased herbicide usage and cost, increased planting flexibility, environmental benefits, and improved product.

Increased Yields: Prior to the introduction of Bt Corn, it was difficult to control the corn borer with chemical insecticides and many farmers accepted significant yield losses (3 to 6% per one corn borer per plant) rather than go to the expense of treating crops with chemical insecticides.

Therefore, in areas in which the corn borer is a challenge, the use of Bt Corn will result in significantly increased yields. In the absence of a corn borer challenge, the use of Bt Corn will not impact yield.

The use of herbicide tolerant (Roundup Ready) soybeans results in significant increases in yield.

Decreased Pesticide Usage: In the U.S., Bt Corn and cotton resulted in 3.5 million pounds less pesticide being applied to cropland in 1999. In addition to the cost savings associated with the purchase of the chemicals, the farmer saves on time and fuel with fewer trips into the fields.

Decreased Herbicide Usage: In the U.S., the use of herbicide tolerant soybeans has resulted in a 22% reduction in herbicide use. With the introduction of Roundup Ready soybeans and cotton there has been an increase in the use of Glyphosate (the active chemical in Roundup) and a decrease in the use of other synthetic herbicides such as Imazethapyrn, Pendimethalin, and Trifluralin.

This information has been used to criticize Roundup Ready products as simply a means for manufacturer Monsanto to sell more Roundup. However, there has been a net decrease in total pounds of herbicide applied and Roundup is 3 to 16 times less toxic than other herbicides and is 1.6 to 1.9 times less likely to persist in environment.

As with the insect resistant products, the farmer also realizes cost savings associated with the decreased purchase of chemicals and time and fuel savings with fewer trips into the fields. The farmer also benefits from improved harvest efficiency (fewer weed seeds and decreased foreign material).

Increased Planting Flexibility and Environmental Benefits: The use of herbicide tolerant crops makes it easier to use reduced tillage or no-till method systems, and to rotate crops. This reduces soil erosion and fuel use.

The decrease in the use of pesticides and herbicides associated with the use of transgenic crops is an environmentally positive benefit of this technology.

Improved Product: Due to reduced kernel damage, Bt Corn is healthier, more nutritious, and less likely to be contaminated with molds and mycotoxins than conventional corn

Herbicide tolerant soybeans are healthier and generally of better quality and less contaminated with weed seeds and other foreign material.

Summary: The rapid adoption rate of transgenic crops is evidence that farmers have recognized and realized the many benefits of this technology, including increased yields, decreased pesticide cost, decreased herbicide cost, increased planting flexibility, environmental benefits, and improved product.

For more information I suggest the following web sites: www.ers.usda.gov/briefing/biotechnology , and www.colostate.edu/programs/lifesciences/transgenicCrops/index

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter, 14.5.

Mold and Mycotoxins in Animal Feed and the Importance of Feed Bin Sanitation
By Dr. Michael Elliot, Nutritionist, Director of Technical Services, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc. and Ray Leiby, Quality Control Supervisor, Wenger's Feed Mill, Inc.

Molds in animal feed are a source of significant economic loss to producers. They adversely influence performance by altering the nutrient composition of feed ingredients, decreasing the efficiency of nutrient utilization, and by producing toxic secondary metabolites (mycotoxins).

As molds grow, the nutrient content of the substrate (grain, oil seeds, or complete feed) is altered. Moldy feed will have a lower energy content and an altered amino acid and vitamin profile. The impact of mold growth on dietary energy content was demonstrated by Bartov et al. (1982). Sterilized corn was contaminated with a mold known not to produce any toxic mycotoxins. Three-percent additional soybean oil was required to produce weight gain, feed efficiency, and protein retention equivalent to that produced by the basal diet.

Want to learn more? For a more detailed paper on the feeding and management of pullets and layers in hot weather, please contact your Wenger’s service person, sales representative or technical services.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter.



Nutrient Management
To Store or Not to Store Manure. . .
Bill Achor, Environmental Coordinator

Several of you have called with the question, “Should I build a manure storage building?” And for most of you, I have asked you the question: “Why?”

Most have cited fly control as their number one concern. However, other reasons for building a storage building included added flexibility with regard to manure spreading and further processing of manure into a value-added product. Regardless of why a manure storage building is built, it still requires management. Remember, whatever you put in that storage building has to be removed. The more you use it, the more it needs to be emptied. Concentrated manure hauling could put a crimp in your daily chores on the farm when you are accustomed to weekly hauling. Also remember that moisture and fly larva still need to be managed in a storage building.

If your manure is “stackable,” it will go through a heat cycle making it difficult for larva to survive in the pile, but it can still create a nice environment for larva development on or around the pile. However, adding a carbon source (i.e. mulch hay, corn fodder, leaves, or sawdust) can enhance the heat cycle, absorb some of the unwanted moisture, and produce a low grade compost. In order to have a good compost, you will need to have a 4:1 to 6:1 ratio of manure to carbon source depending on the moisture of the manure. Dry manure can be hauled further distances more cost effectively and can demand premium prices if it is the proper quality.

If your manure is not “stackable,” you might be looking at a liquid system that would allow you to add your wash water from the cleanouts as well. Liquid systems require specialized manure hauling equipment, and rain and snow have to be figured into the total volume that needs to be transported each crop season. Liquid systems usually require storage inspections by a certified engineer after they are installed and may require a special permit depending on the size of storage proposed. Liquid systems typically have more odors when hauling as the crust is disturbed and allows all the collected gases to escape. However, fly larva have a difficult time surviving in the liquid environment.

Whether you choose a dry or liquid system, care has to go into the location of the structure so that it complies with all nutrient management requirements, and set back distances from bodies of water, drainage ways, wells, and property lines. Cost share money is available to those who qualify and to those who desire technical assistance in the design of the system. Individuals that use the Natural Resource and Conservation Service (NRCS) for either financial or technical assistance may need to comply with nutrient management standards that will include a P-based nutrient management plan. This requirement will go into effect for new cooperators after May 1, 2002. Your local conservation district office can also help guide you in design, location, and financial assistance options in your specific region. Some districts may require a review of your conservation plan so having a current plan may expedite the application process.

Implied copyright. This article was first published in Wenger's Millogram Newsletter.

Nutrient Management Series: Ground Application
by Bill Achor, Environmental Coordinator

The Nutrient Management Advisory Board continues to labor through the many proposed changes to the Act 6 Nutrient Management Act. The year began with a conceptual list of what the changes might look like and as we look at the calendar and realize that 2002 has all but evaporated, the Board has only managed to debate eight (8) of the twenty (20) proposed changes to the regulations. It is a painful process as most in attendance realize that more of the proposed changes than not are a result of isolated situations that have occurred across the state that have received much attention from the environmental community which have been interpreted as being major state-wide water quality concerns. Nonetheless, these issues have made the “top twenty” and so the discussions continue. A meeting in December is scheduled with the hope of finishing the list.

In this article I would like to discuss another one of the proposed changes as it relates to bare ground manure application. This is closely related to the Phosphorus issue that I discussed in the last article. This change could require a dramatic shift in how we move manure nutrients out to the fields when our cropping days are done. This change is tracking very closely to NRCS 590 Standard, which states in detail the requirements of bare ground or fall/winter manure application. Up unto this point, the State Conservation Commission has relied on DEP’s Manure Management Manual and Field Application supplement that provided recommendations for applying manure.

The proposed change would limit fall/winter application of manure unless permanent vegetation exists, a cover crop is established or a minimum of 25% residue is present at time of spreading. This could affect both liquid and dry manure applications as many farmers are looking at fall as a critical time to spread manure to allow for adequate storage capacity throughout the winter. There is still potential for application only if the P-index was calculated on a field, both “A” and “B” sections, and manure application is allowed as a result of the analysis. This will bring up more than a few concerns.

The genuine concern in fall/winter application which generated this change was the idea that 20% to 40% of manure that is applied in the fall is typically not done on an existing crop that can capture and utilize the nutrients. This exposes these nutrients to fall and winter weather that can contribute to surface and groundwater leaching leaving less than 50% of the N and most of the P for the following spring small grains and grass hay and less than 20% of N and most of the P for the following summer’s corn crop. So in essence we are applying excess P with little N benefit.

Fall application had also been used in some instances as a disposal method for N, which allowed for more application on less acres due to the N losses previously mentioned. Application methods may also be challenged as the conflict between surface application and incorporation may need to be resolved. Soil scientists and agronomists are not in agreement either as surface runoff potential needs to be compared to the potential for ground water leaching. There is even some ‘frost till’ technology being researched in our northeastern states that may prove that incorporating manures into cold or frozen soils may be an acceptable best management practice. Equipment is currently available to apply liquid manures in growing crops or moderate to heavy residues with little to no soil surface disturbance. However, dry manure application equipment has not seen the same intensive progress.

If incorporation is not included in our options for bare ground application due to a P-index determination, and if surface application does meet the above proposed restrictions, producers may be forced to store or stockpile dry manure from late October to mid April. Can it be properly stored or stockpiled until optimal application is available? Only time will prove this effective.

If we want more of our crop acreage available for fall/winter application there will need to be a dramatic increase in the uses of cover crops and “green” manures that are tilled under prior to spring planting. In areas that cover cropping is difficult to establish prior to fall’s drop in temperatures, other best management practices will need to be implemented.

And if incorporation is necessary to conserve nutrients, how can it be done in such a way as to conserve the residue cover that reduces the potential for soil erosion. We do not want to regulate application of nutrients and forget our fundamental elements of soil conservation. Nutrient management and soil conservation must be integrated to produce the most effective means of environmental protection.

No one wakes up in the morning with the thought of polluting a creek or a river. It often happens because we do not plan for it not to happen. And as we increase our knowledge of how to prevent pollution from our farming practices from entering the Bay, to not apply the knowledge when appropriate borders on neglect. We may need to modify some of our traditional farming practices to accomplish continual environmental improvement and in doing so leaving a legacy to the next generation in that we left it better than we found it.

Implied copyright. This article first appeared in Wenger's Millogram newsletter.



General

1. What is Foot and Mouth Disease

*Acute infectious viral disease that affects domestic cattle, sheep, pigs, goats, and deer. Other cloven-hooved animals, elephants, hedgehogs, and rats are also susceptible to infection.
*Incubation period=2 to 16 days
*Rarely fatal, except in young animals
*Causes decreases in production
*Most frequent lesions include vesicles (blisters) on the tongue and inside of the mouth, inside the nostrils, on the coronary band, teats, udder, snout of pigs, and area between the toes.
*Frequent sequela to disease include: weight loss from painful lesions in mouth causing decrease in food intake; decrease in milk production; chronic lameness from painful lesions on feet; abortions and sterility

2. How is Food and Mouth Disease Transmitted?

*Droplets: Direct contact with incubating or clinically ill animals (saliva, feces, urine, milk, semen). Recovering animals or exposed vaccinated animals may carry the virus in the oropharynx for months and could transmit the virus through the mouth and nose.
*Vectors: Animate (people, other animals such as dogs on the farm, etc.); Inanimate (equipment, tools, boots, clothing, etc.)
*Airborne virus particles

3. Are Humans at Risk?

*Human disease from Foot and Mouth Disease is rare (1 documented case in Great Britain in 1966)
*Symptoms mimicked a mild case of influenza with some blisters
*Mild, self-limiting disease in humans

4. Where has Foot and Mouth been identified?

*Endemic in parts of Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and South America (sporadic outbreaks in free zone)
*Recent outbreaks in the United Kingdom involving 39 locations (pigs, sheep, & cattle) as of March 2, 2001

5. What can be done to prevent and control Foot and Mouth Disease?

*Slaughter of infected, recovered, and susceptible contact animals
*Disinfection of premises and all infected material
*Destruction of carcasses, litter, and susceptible animals products in the infected area
*Quarantine measures
*Control of animal movement across borders from potentially infected areas to disease-free areas

For more information about Foot and Mouth disease, see the USDA's fact site at: http://www.aphis.usda.gov/oa/fmd/index.html

The U.S. Department of Agriculture has also established a toll-free telephone center to respond to questions from the public, industry, and media regarding USDA's response to the outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease in Europe. The toll-free number is 1-800-601-9327. International callers can reach the center by dialing 01-301-734-9257.

Avian Influenza Guidelines

*If a poultry dealer must come to your farm, insist that his crates and trucks are clean. Never allow crates to be put in your house, particularly if any birds are to remain on the farm. The avian influenza virus is consistently found in the New York and New Jersey live bird markets.

*Keep the poultry house locked. Allow only essential personnel into your poultry house. They should wear clean or disposable coveralls, head cover and plastic boots, which can be washed and disinfected. Have a disinfectant footbath that is changed daily at the outside entries to the poultry house and egg room.

*Both domestic and wild waterfowl, including gulls, can be carriers of A.I. virus. Don’t carry feces from these birds on your shoes or equipment into your poultry house.

*Do not spread manure from any flock that has experienced suspicious illness and mortality within at least three weeks after illness unless manure is first composted and covered for several weeks.

*Dispose of dead birds safely – by incineration, burial, composting or rendering. Never pile birds outside a building or dispose of in fields.

*Do not use equipment from another farm on your farm unless it was cleaned and disinfected.

*Egg pickup and feed delivery people should wear protective food covering – either disposable plastic boots that are left on the farm to discard or rubber boots that are disinfected.

*Insist that supplies brought to your farm are either new (if fiber flats) or are clean, washed, and disinfected (plastic flats, carts, shelves or dividers).

*Do not attend auctions where poultry are sold.

*Wild birds (starlings etc.) could spread the AI virus. Keep birds screened out of your houses and work with pest control professionals to try and reduce or eliminate these birds on your premises.

*Growers should not wear poultry house clothing and footwear away from the farm.

*Restrict the movement of all vehicles (automobiles and trucks) entering and leaving your farm. Disinfect the tires, undercarriage (when possible) and floor of vehicles.

*Participate in the statewide Avian Influenza monitoring program. This includes submitting at least 10 and preferably 24-30 eggs (blood eggs are preferable) per month from all laying flocks and collecting 10 bloods at slaughter from meat bird flocks.

*Report any increased illness or mortality to your company or to the Pennsylvania Department of Agriculture (717) 783-8300.

Special notice from the PennAg Poultry Council

Biosecurity Recommendations for Travelers

The following recommendations are provided for travelers who plan to visit a country that has recently experience an outbreak of Foot and Mouth Disease (FMD).

*
Consider the necessity of the visit

*
Whenever practical, avoid visiting premises that have livestock.

*
Follow all guidelines and recommendations of the country that you are visiting relative to restricted activities or areas.

*
Avoid visiting farms in infected or otherwise restricted areas.

*
If you are driving, follow recommended biosecurity measures for the vehicle. IE parking off the premises, spraying/washing tires, washing the vehicle, etc.

*
Avoid handling livestock (especially those susceptible to FMD - cattle, sheep, goats, swine, and other even-toed animals.)

*
Do not bring food or other articles from the visited farms

*
Do not take any articles onto the farms that aren't necessary. All items should be disinfected after the visit.

*
If visiting a farm, consider wearing clothing and shoes that you would be willing to discard before returning to the United States.

*
Wear outer boots or other shoe coverings when visiting farms. Disinfect boots or appropriately discard disposable shoe coverings when leaving the farm. A disinfectant solution of one ounce of household bleach in a gallon of water may be used.

*
Bathe (and shampoo your hair) and change clothing before visiting other premises with livestock.

*
Keep a written record of the name, address, and general location of the premises.

*
Before, or immediately after, returning from abroad, wash all clothing that was used on farm visits in hot water. Consider adding chlorine bleach to the wash water. Carefully examine and clean all footwear. If practical, disinfect or discard footwear before returning to the United States.

*
Assure that children and other members of your party follow the same guidelines.

*
If you have come in contact with livestock on an infected farm or in an infected area, you should avoid contact with other livestock for at least 14 days.



©Copyright 2005